A Study on Risk of Delay in Power Plant Projects

During 35 years of recovery and development, Vietnam economy has become stable and strongly developed. Many factories have been opened and producing a large quantity of goods for domestic and international market. Therefore, the demands of electric power become essential. Understanding this huge demand, Vietnam has focused on developing the domestic power production.

Looking at the picture of Power development in Vietnam, and with the characteristics, complexity and high rate of construction and installation, all of the Power project must be done under EPC Contract. EPC contract is the best solution that has been selected for such project in Vietnam. Like any other types of Contract, risk of delay also occurs in EPC contract under different stage such as:
- Engineering: Delay caused by change in design, lack of input data, and mistake in design
- Procurement: Risk of transportation, shortage of material, and cost fluctuation
- Construction: execution capability, inappropriate construction management, and bad coordination

There are a lot of participants who take part in Power Plant Project, and each of party plays a different role and therefore carries a different potential risk of delay. When delay occurs, it will not only affect the time schedule, but also the cost, and quality of project. Understanding delay factors and root causation is a foundation to help Vietnamese companies to develop their project management system, thus to avoid risk of delays in future projects.

Mr. Nguyen Le Minh made a case study on Nhon Trach 1 combined cycle power plant project in Dong Nai, Vietnam. The purpose of his study were to: (1) identify & classify delay events in Thermal Power Plant Project; (2) investigate major delay events, detail analysis to find out delay behaviors and main causations; and (3) propose recommendation for improving so that such delays and causation factors can be prevented for future projects.

Conclusion

From the case study of Nhon Trach 1 Power Plant, out of 10 major delays that have been found out, there are 5 delays which are critical to the whole projects. These factors are events in engineering stage, procurement stage, and construction phase. In these 10 delays, 4 factors are caused by owner, 1 factor by consultant, 3 factors by unforeseen condition and 4 factors by contractor.

By analyzing situations and key factors, it was discovered that the major delay behaviors includes:
i) Owner’s failure in making timely decision
ii) Owner’s failure in following up contract commitment
iii) Consultant’s mistakes in design/specification
iv) Contractor’s mistakes in project scheduling, planning
v) Contractor make fault in project management
vi) Lack of cooperation among Parties
vii) Unforeseen/unpredictable situations causing delay

These factors are also classified into:
i) Technical factors: 5 events
ii) Managerial factors: 4 events
iii) External factors: 3 events

We can see that the causations come from not only Contractor but also Owner and Consultant, which postulates a gap in large scale project management of Vietnamese companies (in the role of either Owner, Consultant or Constructor) when being compared with international level.

Although the study may not present typical situations for all Power Plant Projects, it still demonstrates some delay causations that properly happen in power plant projects in Vietnam, including:
i) Inability of large scale project management from Owner, Contractor and Consultant;
ii) Being inactive in problem solving due to bureaucracy mechanism; and
iii) Parties’ interaction which is based on personal relationship rather than contract commitment.

For each delay factor occurred in this project, and to prevent such root causations in this project that may re-occurs in the future, below are recommendations which have to be considered.

i) Establishing a Site Coordination Board: Most of problems can be reduced or eliminated impacts by strengthening cooperation among Parties. Therefore, it’s very important that the project should have an efficient information transmit and coordination system. It should have a Coordination Board comprises of members of all Parties (Owner, Consultant, Contractor, Subcontractor), this Board makes sure that information and coordination will be transferred from top managers to site supervisors. Coordination Board is supposed to take responsibility of analyzing any arising problem and suggest most suitable solutions.

ii) Employing advance management technology: Most of Contractors in Vietnam haven’t fully developed a total management system. Instead of this, they usually use human experience and old management mechanism which is mostly based on paper and meeting work. This system is hard to manage a huge information and activities of large scale projects. To fulfill large requirement of power projects, Contractors should apply advanced management technology (i.e. Primavera) as the first step; and build up an own management system for their long-term development.

iii) Improving contract management competency: Most of local companies consider Contract just a binding of cost and payment. In fact, Contract binds responsibility, authority, scope of work and of Participants. Learning from the case study, Owner, Consultant and Contractor sometime cannot comply with Contract commitment, which cause delay in the whole projects. Hence, it’s very critical for domestic companies to understand and comply with the contract thoroughly.

His thesis abstract is copied and posted.

Abstract

In recent years, construction industry in Vietnam has been developed dramatically, contributing to national development. Besides civil construction, infrastructure, residential development, there are a large number of Power plant projects are and will be implemented in the next 20 years.

Similar to other types of construction project, power plant project must also deal with risk of delay on construction stage. As a large scale project with thousands of activities, power plant project requires a very carefully planning, scheduling and monitoring to avoid these risks
There is a fact that in reality, implementation of power projects usually goes behind the schedule, causing a huge loss to social economy and obstructs the development of local construction market.

The purpose of this report, by studying a real case in Nhon Trach 1 Power Plant project, is to analyze some main factors that cause delay in such power plant projects; from that, to suggest solutions to prevent occurrence of same delays in future projects.